IMPORT GUIDE

The Digital Product Passport at the EU Border: What Customs Will Check

Published 25.09.2026 · Reading time ~5 min · by Lior Gabriel Graetz · LG Fashion Labs

When a product covered by a Digital Product Passport (DPP) requirement is imported into the EU, the check written into the law is narrow. Under Article 15 of the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR), Regulation (EU) 2024/1781, customs may release goods for free circulation "only after having verified as a minimum" that the product's unique registration identifier and commodity code match the EU's DPP registry. The minimum check concerns whether a passport is registered, not what it contains.

The Commission launched the registry on 20 July 2026. But Article 15 applies only to products covered by an ESPR delegated act, and for textiles the Commission's indicative timeline lists adoption for Q3–Q4 2027. Sources: EU legal texts and Commission pages, listed below.

1. The rule in Article 15

Article 15(1) ESPR: "Any person intending to place a product covered by a delegated act … under the customs procedure 'release for free circulation' shall provide or make available to customs authorities the unique registration identifier of that product referred to in Article 13(5)." This applies "from the moment the registry is operational."

Under Article 15(2), customs may release the product "only after having verified as a minimum that the unique registration identifier … and the commodity code provided or made available to them correspond to the data stored in the registry." That verification is to "take place electronically and automatically via the interconnection" between registry and customs systems, and applies "from the moment that interconnection is operational."

Release for free circulation "shall not be deemed to be proof of compliance with this Regulation or other Union law." Recital 44 gives the purpose: "This would allow customs authorities to verify that a digital product passport for imported products exists."

2. Where the identifier comes from: the DPP registry

Article 13 ESPR required the Commission to set up the registry by 19 July 2026. It stores "at least the unique identifiers" and, for goods intended for release for free circulation, the commodity code. The Commission launched it on 20 July 2026 with a testing environment, and refers to a "current testing phase" ahead of the first implementation deadline (18 February 2027, certain large batteries). The operator placing the product on the market uploads the data (Article 13(4)) and the registry returns a unique registration identifier; that communication "shall not be deemed to be proof of compliance" (Article 13(5)). See our registry guide.

Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1778, in force since 6 August 2026, sets the rules. The passport is registered by a "verified economic operator placing the product on the market or putting it into service" (Article 8(1)). The Commission's automatic checks include, where relevant, "the validity of the commodity code of the product in relation to the permitted ranges for this product group" (Article 8(7)).

Delegated acts must list each product group's commodity codes (Article 8(a)), and the passport itself may carry "relevant commodity codes, such as a TARIC code" and the importer's "Economic Operators Registration and Identification (EORI) number" (Annex III, points (d) and (j)).

3. Who is responsible for the registration

The Commission's DPP FAQ (question 11) says a passport "must be active and registered when a product is placed on the EU market" and, for imports, "before they can be released for free circulation by customs authorities." Depending on where the product is made, it names "the manufacturer, the authorised representative, the importer, the distributor, the dealer or the fulfilment service provider" as responsible for creating the DPP and registering its identifiers.

ESPR requires importers to ensure a passport is available "including a back-up copy of the most up-to-date version of the digital product passport stored by a digital product passport service provider" (Article 29(2)(c)). Under Article 34, importers and distributors are "considered manufacturers" where they place a product on the market under their own name or trademark, or modify one already on the market in a way that affects compliance.

4. What customs can see, and what happens to a stopped product

Customs authorities have access to the registry (Article 13(6)) and may "retrieve and use the data included in the digital product passport and the registry", including for "risk management, customs controls and release for free circulation" (Article 15(4)). Checking whether the content is right is a different job: "The verification of the substantive correctness of the data registered remains a task for the market surveillance authorities" (recital 16, Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1778).

For a stopped product, recital 102 ESPR says Regulation (EU) 2019/1020, the "horizontal framework for market surveillance and control of products entering the Union market", should apply, insofar as ESPR has no specific provisions "with the same objective, nature or effect". Under it, authorities "shall suspend the release" where, for example, a product "is not accompanied by the documentation required by the Union law applicable to it" (Article 26(1)(a)). Where market surveillance authorities conclude that a product may not be placed on the market because it does not comply with the applicable Union law, they require the authorities designated under Article 25(1) not to release it (Article 28(2)). See our penalties guide.

5. Timeline: what is live and what is scheduled

DateMilestoneSource
19 July 2026Legal deadline to set up the registryESPR Art. 13(1)
20 July 2026Registry launched, with a testing environmentCommission news item
6 August 2026Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1778 enters into forceEUR-Lex
Q3–Q4 2027 (indicative)Planned adoption of the ESPR delegated acts for textiles, aluminium and tyres (textile apparel page: Q4 2027)Commission DPP page; textile apparel page
At least 18 months after a delegated act enters into forceDate of application, unless "duly justified"ESPR Art. 4(4); Commission DPP page
Within four years of the entry into force of the Article 13(5) implementing actRegistry interconnected with customs systems (EU CSW-CERTEX)ESPR Art. 15(3)

6. Reading these rules together

Article 15 has three conditions, each with its own date. A delegated act must cover the product: for textiles, the Commission lists adoption as planned for Q3–Q4 2027 (Q4 2027 on its textile apparel page), with timelines that "may evolve as legislative and technical work progresses." A registered passport must exist: the registry launched on 20 July 2026. And the automatic check needs the interconnection, which Article 15(3) requires within four years of the entry into force of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1778 on 6 August 2026, that is, by 6 August 2030. A footnote in the Commission's FAQ says "expected around 2029"; the legal text is the four-year rule.

Adoption in Q3–Q4 2027 plus the 18-month minimum in Article 4(4) would put any textile date of application no earlier than 2029, unless the Commission justifies an earlier date. An importer is "any natural or legal person established in the Union that places a product from a third country on the Union market" (Article 2(44)), which brings it within the "operator placing the product on the market" that Article 8(1) of the Implementing Regulation names as the registrant.

The texts reviewed do not yet specify which commodity codes a textiles act will list, how the identifier is entered in a customs declaration, or the arrangements for the registry–customs interconnection, which recital 113(b) lists among the matters for Commission implementing powers. Regulation 2026/1778 does not mention EU CSW-CERTEX.

Sources

All sources were accessed on 25 September 2026.

DPP AUDIT

How ready is your collection for the DPP?

Benchmark one complete collection against the LGFL DPP Data Framework. 10 domains, four ESPR categories. Under NDA.

Start Your DPP Audit

Frequently asked questions

Will EU customs check my Digital Product Passport? +
The minimum check set by Article 15(2) ESPR is that the unique registration identifier and the commodity code match the data stored in the DPP registry, before a product is released for free circulation. It applies to products covered by an ESPR delegated act, and the automatic verification applies from the moment the registry is interconnected with the customs systems. Verifying the substantive correctness of the passport remains a task for market surveillance authorities.
Does the customs check apply to clothing and footwear yet? +
Article 15 ESPR applies to products covered by an ESPR delegated act. The Commission's indicative timeline lists the adoption of the delegated acts for textiles as planned for Q3–Q4 2027 (Q4 2027 on its textile apparel page), and Article 4(4) ESPR provides that a delegated act's date of application shall not be earlier than 18 months from its entry into force, except in duly justified cases. The Commission launched the DPP registry on 20 July 2026.
Who registers the passport for imported products? +
Under Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1778, the passport is registered by a verified economic operator placing the product on the market or putting it into service (Article 8(1)). The Commission's DPP FAQ lists the manufacturer, authorised representative, importer, distributor, dealer or fulfilment service provider as the possible responsible parties, depending on where the product is made. The importer must ensure a DPP is available, including a back-up copy held by a DPP service provider (ESPR Article 29(2)(c)), and is considered a manufacturer if it places the product on the market under its own name or trademark (Article 34).
Does clearing customs prove that a product complies? +
No. Article 15(2) ESPR states that release for free circulation shall not be deemed to be proof of compliance with the Regulation or other Union law. The registry's communication of the unique registration identifier is likewise not proof of compliance (Article 13(5)), and recital 16 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1778 leaves the verification of the substantive correctness of registered data to market surveillance authorities.