COMPLIANCE DEEP DIVE

Your Customer Wants Sustainability Data: The CSRD Value-Chain Cap, ESRS E5 and Why DPP Supplier Data Is Different

Published 20.10.2026 · Reading time ~16 min · by Lior Gabriel Graetz · LG Fashion Labs

Directive (EU) 2026/470, the Omnibus I Directive, has narrowed the CSRD: from financial years starting on or after 1 January 2027, it applies to undertakings and groups with more than EUR 450 million in net turnover and more than 1,000 employees on average. For a fashion brand below those thresholds, the CSRD now arrives as customer requests, because large retailers and brand groups that report must, where applicable, cover their value chain and may ask their suppliers for data. A supplier that did not exceed an average of 1,000 employees in the preceding financial year is a "protected undertaking" and, for financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2027, may decline CSRD requests that go beyond a closed list of datapoints in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1560.

This guide sets out who is in scope and from when, how that value-chain cap works, what ESRS E5 asks large groups about materials and products after Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1563, and why the cap does not reach the supplier duties that the ESPR can attach to a future textile Digital Product Passport (DPP). The short version: the cap covers requests made for CSRD reporting only; ESRS E5 is reported at the level of the undertaking or group and is not DPP data; and Article 38 of the ESPR, which can oblige suppliers to give manufacturers information free of charge, applies only once a delegated act specifies it, and no textile act had been adopted on 20 October 2026. A short section covers the CSDDD after Omnibus I, followed by the status of pending acts on that date.

FY2027

Financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2027: the new CSRD scope, the value-chain cap and the simplified ESRS apply (Article 5(2) of Directive (EU) 2022/2464 as amended, Article 4 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1560, Article 3 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1563).

1,000

The average number of employees in the preceding financial year that a supplier must not exceed to be a protected undertaking under the value-chain cap (Article 19a(3) of Directive 2013/34/EU).

0

ESPR delegated acts for textiles adopted by 20 October 2026. Article 38 supplier duties apply only where such an act specifies them (Articles 4(6) and 38 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1781).

1. Who must report under the CSRD after Omnibus I, and from when

Directive (EU) 2026/470 was published in the Official Journal on 26 February 2026 and entered into force on 18 March 2026, the twentieth day after publication (Article 6). It amends the Accounting Directive (Directive 2013/34/EU), which contains the CSRD's reporting duties, and the CSRD's own timetable in Directive (EU) 2022/2464. From financial years starting on or after 1 January 2027, sustainability reporting applies to undertakings which, on their balance sheet dates, "exceed a net turnover of EUR 450 000 000 and an average number of 1 000 employees during the financial year", and to parent undertakings of groups that exceed both figures on a consolidated basis (Articles 19a(1) and 29a(1) of Directive 2013/34/EU and Article 5(2) of Directive (EU) 2022/2464, as amended). Both thresholds must be exceeded: more than EUR 450 million in net turnover and more than 1,000 employees.

Undertakings that already report keep a transitional window. Large public-interest entities with more than 500 employees, and public-interest entities that are parents of large groups with more than 500 employees, report for financial years starting between 1 January 2024 and 31 December 2026; for financial years starting on or after 1 January 2027, the new thresholds decide. Member States may exempt those that do not exceed EUR 450 million in net turnover or an average of 1,000 employees during the financial year, for financial years starting between 1 January 2025 and 31 December 2026 (Article 5(2) of Directive (EU) 2022/2464, as amended). Member States must transpose the amendments to the Accounting Directive and the CSRD by 19 March 2027 (Article 5(1) of Directive (EU) 2026/470). For the full scope picture, including the separate rules for non-EU groups, see section 7 of our SME thresholds guide.

The two thresholds leave a fashion brand in one of three positions. If you exceed both, you report, and your report must, where applicable, cover your value chain, including your products, business relationships and supply chain (Article 19a(3), first subparagraph). If you have an average of 1,000 employees or fewer, you do not report, and towards reporting customers you are a protected undertaking, a test based on the preceding financial year (section 2). If you have more than 1,000 employees but EUR 450 million or less in net turnover, you do not report, and the cap does not protect you either.

2. The value-chain cap: what a protected supplier may decline from 2027

The cap protects suppliers, not reporters. Article 19a(3) of the Accounting Directive, and Article 29a(3) for groups, define a protected undertaking as an undertaking which "does not exceed, on its balance sheet date, an average number of 1 000 employees during the preceding financial year" and "is in the value chain of a reporting undertaking". There is no turnover test. A reporting customer may rely on your self-declaration of that status without verifying it, unless it knows, or can reasonably be expected to know, that the declaration is manifestly incorrect. For reporting under the ESRS, the cap "also applies to non-EU undertakings in the upstream and downstream value chain of the reporting undertaking" (ESRS 1, paragraph 66, as replaced by Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1563).

The core right reads: "Protected undertakings shall have the right to decline to provide information exceeding the information specified in the voluntary standards in response to a request made for the purpose of sustainability reporting as required by this Directive". Four rules back it up. A reporting undertaking may not require more in its contractual and other arrangements made to meet its reporting requirements; "any contractual provision contrary to point (a) shall not be binding, without however affecting the binding nature of the remaining provisions of the contract"; a reporting undertaking that asks for more must ensure that you are told which information exceeds the voluntary standards and that you have a statutory right to decline it; and a reporting undertaking that reports its value chain without such extra information from protected undertakings is deemed to have complied (Article 19a(3), fourth subparagraph, points (a) to (d)).

The "voluntary standards" now exist as law. Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1560, published on 21 September 2026 and in force since 24 September 2026, sets out a voluntary standard in Annex I, with a Basic Module and a Comprehensive Module, for undertakings that are not required to report (Articles 2 and 4). It is based on Commission Recommendation (EU) 2025/1710, which, according to recital 5, should be considered as no longer producing any legal effects from the Regulation's entry into force. Article 3 then makes only part of the standard the cap: "The value chain cap shall only comprise the datapoints specified in Annex II to this Regulation". Article 3 applies from financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2027 (Article 4). Read together with Article 19a(3) and ESRS 1, paragraph 66, the upper limit of what a reporting customer may require from a protected supplier is the Annex II list; on that reading, a protected undertaking may decline CSRD requests for anything beyond it, even where the item appears elsewhere in the voluntary standard.

Annex II sets a narrower cap for undertakings with 10 employees or fewer. The table summarises it; the references are to the disclosures and paragraphs of the voluntary standard in Annex I.

AreaDatapoints in the cap (Annex II)10 employees or fewerMore than 10 employees
General information (B1)Module option selected; individual or consolidated reporting basis; general information on the undertaking (paragraph 27, points (a)(i) and (ii), (c) and (e)(i) to (vii))YesYes
Energy and emissions (B3)Total energy consumption in MWh (paragraph 32, first sentence); estimated absolute gross greenhouse gas emissions (paragraph 33)NoYes
Water (B6)Total water withdrawal (paragraph 36)NoYes
Circular economy and waste (B7)Whether and how circular economy principles are applied (paragraph 38, first sentence); total weight of waste generated, hazardous and non-hazardous (paragraph 39(a)); proportion of waste diverted to recycling or reuse (paragraph 39(b))NoYes
Workforce (B8 to B10)Employees per type of contract and per gender; number and rate of recordable work-related accidents; pay at or above the applicable minimum wage; collective bargaining coverage; average annual training hours per employeeYesYes
Comprehensive Module (C1, C5 to C7)Significant groups of products or services, significant markets and main business relationships; employee turnover rate; code of conduct or human rights policy; complaints-handling mechanism; confirmed incidents in the own workforce and involving workers in the value chain, affected communities, consumers and end-usersNoYes
Everything elseFor example the annual mass-flow of relevant materials used (paragraph 39(c)), material composition, recycled content, durability, repairability or recyclability of productsNoNo

Note what is missing. The voluntary standard asks undertakings in sectors using significant material flows for "the annual mass-flow of relevant materials used" (Annex I, disclosure B7, paragraph 39(c)), but Annex II does not list it. Nor does Annex II list material composition, recycled content, durability, repairability or recyclability of products. The only circular-economy datapoints in the cap are whether, and if so how, the supplier applies circular economy principles, its total waste and the share diverted to recycling or reuse, and these only for suppliers with more than 10 employees.

Recital 4 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1560, in full

"It is necessary to set out how the value chain cap should work considering the different kinds of datapoints that the standard contains. It is also necessary to ensure an appropriate balance between protecting undertakings in the value chain from excessive information demands and ensuring that the application of the value chain cap does not imply unnecessary additional burden for undertakings subject to the mandatory sustainability reporting requirements. Therefore, only essential datapoints should be covered by the value chain cap. To enhance clarity, the disclosures covered by the value chain cap should be set out in a dedicated list, which should distinguish between the disclosures constituting the cap for undertakings with more than 10 employees and those constituting the cap for undertakings with 10 employees or fewer. It is important that undertakings subject to mandatory sustainability reporting requirements under Directive 2013/34/EU only request information from undertakings in their value chain insofar as they need that information, and that they request less information than specified in the standard for voluntary use if they do not need all the information in that standard. The value chain cap only applies to information gathering carried out for the purpose of reporting sustainability information under national law transposing Directive 2013/34/EU and should therefore not affect requests for information needed to comply with obligations stemming from other Union or national law, under the conditions set out therein."

The Directive says the same in its own text. Nothing in the right to decline "affects information requests for purposes other than the purpose of sustainability reporting as required by this Directive, including requests for the purpose of complying with Union requirements on undertakings to conduct a due diligence process", and nothing in it imposes or implies an obligation on any undertaking in the value chain to provide sustainability information (Article 19a(3), fifth subparagraph). Recital 12 of Directive (EU) 2026/470 adds that the cap "should not prohibit the sharing of information on a voluntary basis". The cap is a right to say no to one kind of request. It does not stop you from sharing more if you choose to, and it does not touch duties under other law.

For the customer, the cap is workable. ESRS 1 allows value-chain information to be collected directly from counterparties or estimated, using for example sector-average data, spend-based data or other proxies (paragraph 65).

3. ESRS E5 for large groups: what it asks, and what it is not

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1563 replaces Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, which contain the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). It enters into force on 10 November 2026 and applies to financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2027 (Articles 1 and 3); for financial years starting in 2026, undertakings may apply the previous version, the new standards, or the previous version with listed reliefs (Article 2). ESRS E5, Resource Use and Circular Economy, is reported only where that topic relates to material impacts, risks and opportunities of the undertaking (ESRS E5, paragraph 2).

Where it is material, E5 asks, among other things, for the key materials used, their total weight and a breakdown of each, and "the secondary resources used, expressed in weight or as a percentage of the total weight of key materials" (paragraph 13). For products, it asks for "qualitative or quantitative information on the expected durability of its key products", "qualitative or quantitative information on the extent to which its key products are repairable" and "the designed recyclability rate of its key products and their packaging" (paragraph 15). If the undertaking integrates circular economy principles or eco-design requirements in its key products and circular economy services, it must explain how (paragraph 9). Secondary resources include recycled materials and re-used, repaired, refurbished or remanufactured products or components (glossary in Annex II to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1563, definition of secondary resource).

What E5 is not. Key materials are those "essential for the undertaking's ability to manufacture or deliver its products or services, identified through a managerial assessment"; key products are "Products that are central to the undertaking's value creation or strategic objectives, identified through a managerial assessment" (definitions in the same glossary). The reporting undertaking chooses them and reports totals, breakdowns and descriptions for the undertaking or group as a whole. E5 does not ask for data per article, batch or item, and it is not a product passport. In the ESRS, the ESPR appears only as context: ESRS E5, paragraph 5, lists it among the EU frameworks the standard "takes account of", and the glossary refers to it for the full list of eco-design requirements. Neither law provides that DPP data satisfies an ESRS disclosure, or the reverse.

The Commission can no longer adopt a textile-specific ESRS. Directive (EU) 2026/470 deleted its power to adopt sector-specific reporting standards (Article 2, point (6)(a), deleting the third subparagraph of Article 29b(1) of Directive 2013/34/EU); according to recital 20, the Commission "could support undertakings by providing sector-specific guidance" instead.

The overlap with the DPP lies in the subject matter, not in the law. Both deal with materials, recycled content, durability, repairability and recyclability, which also appear among the product aspects listed in Article 5(1) of the ESPR. The table sets the two side by side.

ESRS E5 (CSRD reporting)DPP under the ESPR
WhoUndertakings and groups in CSRD scope (more than EUR 450 million net turnover and more than 1,000 employees), where resource use and circular economy is material (ESRS E5, paragraph 2)Products covered by an ESPR delegated act that requires a passport; no such act exists for textiles
Level of detailUndertaking or group: totals, breakdowns and descriptions for key materials and key products chosen by managerial assessmentProduct model, batch or item, as the delegated act specifies (Article 9(2)(d) of the ESPR)
Materials and recycled contentKey materials used, their total weight and breakdown, and secondary resources used (paragraph 13)Recycled content is one of the product aspects ecodesign requirements may address (Article 5(1)(k)); the delegated act sets the data
Durability, repairability, recyclabilityQualitative or quantitative information on the durability and repairability of key products, and the designed recyclability rate of key products and their packaging (paragraph 15)Product aspects in Article 5(1)(a), (e) and (m), where relevant to the product group
Data from suppliersValue-chain cap: on the reading in section 2, protected undertakings may decline CSRD requests beyond Annex II to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1560; estimates are allowed (ESRS 1, paragraph 65)Article 38 duties for supply chain actors, where the delegated act specifies them; Article 38 sets no employee threshold
From whenFinancial years beginning on or after 1 January 2027 (Article 3 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1563)The application date of a textile delegated act, not earlier than 18 months after its entry into force except in duly justified cases (Article 4(4) of the ESPR)

For a brand that supplies a large group, this means: the group's questions about key materials and secondary resources, asked for its sustainability statement, are CSRD requests. If you are a protected undertaking, they fall outside the Annex II list and, on the reading set out in section 2, you may decline them; the customer can estimate instead. If you choose to answer, the figures can come from the same material records you will need for a passport once a textile delegated act defines its content.

4. ESPR Article 38: why the cap is no shield against DPP data duties

The ESPR has its own supplier rule. Article 38 provides as follows, with points (b) and (c) summarised: "When specified in the delegated act adopted pursuant Article 4, supply chain actors shall" (a) "provide, upon request and free of charge, manufacturers, notified bodies and competent national authorities with available relevant information related to the products they supply or the services they provide"; (b) where that information is missing, allow manufacturers to assess the products or services concerned and give them access to relevant documents or facilities; and (c) enable notified bodies and competent national authorities to verify the accuracy of relevant information related to their activities. A delegated act may impose these duties where necessary for effective market surveillance (Article 4(6), point (a)(iv)). Recital 77 gives examples of such information, "such as the quantity and type or chemical composition of materials used or the production process employed".

In ESPR terms, the manufacturer is usually the brand: any person that manufactures a product "or that has a product designed or manufactured, and markets that product under their name or trademark" (Article 2, point (42)). On that definition, a brand selling under its own name can ask its suppliers for Article 38 information, and so can a retailer for its private-label products. Our manufacturers and private-label guide sets out how the duties are split.

On the wording of the texts, the cap does not help a supplier against such a request, for three reasons. First, the right to decline covers only a request "made for the purpose of sustainability reporting as required by this Directive"; a manufacturer's request under Article 38 serves compliance with an ESPR delegated act. Second, Article 19a(3) itself states that the right to decline does not affect requests for other purposes, and recital 4 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1560 states that the cap should not affect requests for information "needed to comply with obligations stemming from other Union or national law". Third, Article 38 sets no employee threshold. A factory with 200 employees may decline a large brand group's CSRD question on recycled content; once a textile delegated act specifies Article 38, the same factory would still have to give that brand, as manufacturer, the available relevant information covered by that act, on request and free of charge.

Today, Article 38 is dormant for garments. The Publications Office records show no ESPR delegated act for textiles adopted by 20 October 2026; the legal acts adopted under the ESPR so far concern the Ecodesign Forum, unsold consumer products and the DPP registry. Once a textile act is adopted, its date of application cannot be earlier than 18 months after its entry into force, except in duly justified cases (Article 4(4) of the ESPR), and Article 38 applies only if the act specifies it. Until then, what your suppliers give you for a future passport rests on your contracts.

5. The CSDDD after Omnibus I, in brief

Omnibus I also cut back the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD, Directive (EU) 2024/1760). It now applies to EU companies that "had more than 5 000 employees on average and had a net worldwide turnover of more than EUR 1 500 000 000" in the last financial year, to ultimate parent companies of groups that reached those thresholds, and to companies with franchising or licensing agreements in the Union whose royalties exceed EUR 75 million where the company or group has a net worldwide turnover of more than EUR 275 million; parallel tests apply to non-EU companies, measured by turnover generated in the Union (Article 2). Member States must transpose it by 26 July 2028 and apply it from 26 July 2029; the annual statement under Article 16 applies for financial years starting on or after 1 January 2030 (Article 37(1)).

For a brand that supplies a company in scope, the practical point is information requests. They fall outside the CSRD cap, which expressly does not affect requests made to comply with Union due diligence requirements (Article 19a(3) of the Accounting Directive). The CSDDD sets its own limit instead: for the in-depth assessment, "companies may request information from business partners only where that information is necessary, and, in the case of business partners with fewer than 5 000 employees, only when the information cannot reasonably be obtained by other means" (Article 8(2a), point (a)).

Omnibus I also rewrote civil liability: Article 29(1) and (7) are deleted, paragraph 2 was replaced and now requires Member States to ensure a right to full compensation where a company is held liable under national law for damage caused by a failure to comply with the due diligence requirements, and paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 were amended (Article 4, point (20), of Directive (EU) 2026/470). A pending proposal would also delete Article 31 on public procurement (section 6). The CSDDD is a due diligence law, not a product-data law, and it sets no passport requirements. For the EU's separate ban on products made with forced labour, see our Forced Labour Regulation guide.

6. Pending acts and proposals: status on 20 October 2026

Status on 20 October 2026

Official Journal. The Publications Office records list no act amending Directive (EU) 2026/470 or Delegated Regulations (EU) 2026/1560 and 2026/1563. Their corrigenda concern other language versions only: one to Directive (EU) 2026/470 (Lithuanian, dated 22 April 2026) and two to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1563 (Polish, dated 25 September and 15 October 2026); there is none to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1560. The current consolidated versions of the Accounting Directive, the CSRD and the CSDDD are dated 18 March 2026; corrigenda to these acts dated after that concern other language versions only. Textile DPP. No ESPR delegated act for textiles has been adopted; the acts adopted under the ESPR concern the Ecodesign Forum, unsold consumer products and the DPP registry. CSDDD guidelines. Under Have Your Say initiative 14445, "Corporate sustainability due diligence – development of guidelines", the open public consultation ran from 12 June to 14 August 2026 and is closed; adoption of the guidelines, as a Commission communication, is planned for the first quarter of 2027. Public Procurement Act. Proposal COM(2026) 590 of 9 September 2026 (procedure 2026/0265(COD)) would replace the public procurement directives. Point (12) of its Article 147 reads: "Article 31 of Directive (EU) 2024/1760 is deleted"; references to that Article would be read as references to Article 55 of the new Regulation, on socially responsible public procurement. Point (1) of the same Article would delete Article 65 of the ESPR on green public procurement and point (b) of Article 74(3), which lists time-limited exclusion from public procurement procedures among the penalties Member States must be able to impose. The Legislative Observatory shows the procedure in the preparatory phase in Parliament, with the committee referral still pending. The proposal does not amend the Accounting Directive, and its ESPR amendments concern public procurement only.

What this means: the CSRD scope, the value-chain cap and ESRS E5 described in this guide are adopted law and apply from financial years beginning in 2027, with the Directive's CSRD amendments to be transposed into national law by 19 March 2027. The CSDDD guidelines and the Public Procurement Act are still to come, and neither changes the cap. The development that would change the DPP side of this guide is the adoption of a textile delegated act under the ESPR.

7. What to do now

Establish your status and document it. Check your average number of employees in the preceding financial year. If it does not exceed 1,000, you are a protected undertaking towards every reporting customer, and a self-declaration is enough for them to rely on (Article 19a(3) of Directive 2013/34/EU). If you exceed both CSRD thresholds yourself, you are a reporting undertaking, and the cap limits what you may require from your own smaller suppliers for your report.

Sort every data request by purpose. For requests made for a customer's CSRD reporting for financial years from 2027, compare them with Annex II to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1560. The customer must tell you which items go beyond the cap and that you may decline them, and contract clauses that require more are not binding. Requests made to comply with due diligence requirements or with other Union law are outside the cap; answer them on their own legal basis and under your contracts.

Decide what you share voluntarily. The cap is a right to decline, not a ban on sharing (recital 12 of Directive (EU) 2026/470). Material composition and recycled content are not in the cap, but sharing them can be a commercial choice. If you share, take the figures from the same records you use for product compliance, so that the numbers do not diverge.

DPP AUDIT

The data your customers ask for, and the data a passport will need.

Customer questionnaires under the CSRD and a future textile DPP draw on the same material and supplier records, under different rules. In a DPP audit we check how your material composition, recycled content and supplier evidence are recorded per article, and where the records have gaps. Under NDA.

Start Your DPP Audit

Keep one materials and recycled-content record per article. For each style, record the material composition by weight, the recycled share with its evidence, any durability or repair information you hold, and the supplier and production stage each figure comes from. Aggregated, such a record can answer a large customer's questions on key materials and secondary resources, if you choose to answer. At article level, it covers product aspects that the ESPR lists for ecodesign requirements, such as recycled content and recyclability (Article 5(1)); which of them a textile passport will require depends on the delegated act. This is a data-management choice, not a legal requirement: neither the ESRS nor the ESPR treats data prepared for one as satisfying the other.

Prepare your own supplier contracts. Until a textile delegated act specifies Article 38, the product data your suppliers give you for a future passport rests on your contracts. On the wording of Article 19a(3), the cap restricts contractual and other arrangements made "for the purpose of meeting the sustainability reporting requirements of this Directive"; a clause on product-compliance data serves a different purpose. Follow the textile delegated act, Have Your Say initiative 14445 and procedure 2026/0265(COD), and review your plan when each is adopted.

Frequently asked questions

We have 800 employees. Can a large retailer still make us answer its full CSRD supplier questionnaire? +
Not in full, for financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2027, insofar as the questionnaire serves the retailer's CSRD reporting. If your undertaking did not exceed an average of 1,000 employees in the preceding financial year, you are a protected undertaking (Article 19a(3) of Directive 2013/34/EU). You may decline information beyond the datapoints listed in Annex II to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1560, the retailer must tell you which items go beyond that list and that you may decline them, and contract clauses requiring more are not binding. You may still share more voluntarily. The cap does not cover requests made for other purposes, such as due diligence or compliance with other Union law.
Does the value-chain cap cover material composition or recycled-content data? +
No. Annex II to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1560 lists, for suppliers with more than 10 employees, only whether and how the supplier applies circular economy principles, its total waste and the proportion diverted to recycling or reuse. The voluntary standard's datapoint on "the annual mass-flow of relevant materials used" (disclosure B7, paragraph 39(c)) is not in Annex II, and neither is material composition or recycled content. On the reading that Annex II is the upper limit (Article 3 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1560 and ESRS 1, paragraph 66), a protected undertaking may therefore decline such requests when they are made for CSRD reporting.
Will our DPP data satisfy our customer's ESRS E5 reporting? +
There is no legal link. ESRS E5 is reported only where resource use and circular economy is material, at the level of the undertaking or group, on key materials and key products identified through a managerial assessment. A DPP is set per product model, batch or item, as an ESPR delegated act specifies, and no such act exists for textiles yet. Neither text provides that one satisfies the other. In practice, the same underlying material records can inform both, which is a data-management choice.
Can a supplier use the value-chain cap to refuse DPP data requests? +
On the wording of the texts, no. The right to decline covers only requests made for the purpose of CSRD sustainability reporting, and Article 19a(3) of Directive 2013/34/EU and recital 4 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1560 state that the cap does not affect requests for other purposes, including obligations under other Union law. Where a textile delegated act specifies Article 38 of the ESPR, supply chain actors must provide manufacturers, on request and free of charge, with available relevant information; Article 38 itself sets no size threshold. No textile delegated act had been adopted on 20 October 2026, so that duty does not yet apply to garments.
Does the CSDDD apply to our brand? +
Only if your company had more than 5,000 employees on average and a net worldwide turnover of more than EUR 1.5 billion in the last financial year, or is the ultimate parent of a group that reached those thresholds, or meets the royalty-based tests for franchising and licensing; non-EU companies are covered on the basis of their turnover in the Union (Article 2 of Directive (EU) 2024/1760, as amended). The rules apply from 26 July 2029; the annual statement under Article 16 applies for financial years starting on or after 1 January 2030. As a supplier to a company in scope you may receive due diligence requests, which the CSRD cap does not cover; for business partners with fewer than 5,000 employees, the CSDDD allows such requests for the in-depth assessment only when the information cannot reasonably be obtained by other means (Article 8(2a)).
Will there be a textile-specific ESRS? +
Not under the current law. Directive (EU) 2026/470 deleted the Commission's power to adopt sector-specific reporting standards (third subparagraph of Article 29b(1) of Directive 2013/34/EU). According to its recital 20, the Commission could instead support undertakings by providing sector-specific guidance. Textile companies in scope therefore report under the general ESRS, including ESRS E5 where resource use and circular economy is material.

Sources

Directive (EU) 2026/470, Delegated Regulations (EU) 2026/1560 and 2026/1563, Regulation (EU) 2024/1781, COM(2026) 590 and the consolidated versions of 18 March 2026 of Directives 2013/34/EU, (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 were read in the versions published by the EU Publications Office (EUR-Lex); the Publications Office records checked on 20.10.2026 show no act amending Directive (EU) 2026/470 or the two delegated regulations, corrigenda to other language versions only, and no ESPR delegated act for textiles. The Legislative Observatory and Have Your Say were accessed on 20.10.2026. This is general information, not legal, financial or investment advice.